The correct answer is getxIndex() setxIndex(int value) if you want them to be used as properties according to section 8.8: Capitalization of inferred names of the JavaBeans API specification (e.g. access them via ${object.xIndex} in a JSP.
This isn’t a problem: public interface IReadOnly { Data Value { get; } } internal interface IWritable : IReadOnly { new Data Value { get; set; } } internal class Impl : IWritable { public Data Value { get; set; } } The Impl.Value property implementation takes care of both IReadOnly.Value and IWritable.Value, as demonstrated …
private data members are generally considered good because they provide encapsulation. Providing getters and setters for them breaks that encapsulation, but it’s still better than public data members because there’s only once access point to that data. You’ll notice this during debugging. If it’s private, you know you can only modify the variable inside the …
Yes, this is intentional (a part of the spec). If an object has an own property (.property in your example), this property will be used and not an inherited one. If that property is existent, but is an accessor property without a getter, then undefined will be returned. Notice that this behaviour has not changed …
The documentation for every method that you listed is easly reachable from the documentation index . Anyway this may be a little extended reference: __get__, __set__ and __del__ are descriptors “In a nutshell, a descriptor is a way to customize what happens when you reference an attribute on a model.” [official doc link] They are …
Apple states in the “Swift Programming Languages Documentation”: If the protocol only requires a property to be gettable, the requirement can be satisfied by any kind of property, and it is valid for the property to be also settable if this is useful for your own code. For this reason, the five following Playground code …
You can’t do that. You can set setter/getters for properties of objects though. I advice you use ES5 Object.defineProperties though. of course this only works in modern browsers. var obj = function() { … Object.defineProperties(this, { “test”: { “get”: function() { … }, “set”: function() { … } } }); } obj.prototype.func = function() { …
No, not for now 🙁 From the CoffeeScript FAQ: Q: Will you add feature X where feature X depends on a platform? A: No, implementation-specific features are not allowed as a policy. Everything that you write in CoffeeScript should be supported and runnable on any current JavaScript implementation (in practice, this means the lowest common …
Setters and getters have a performance overhead when not optimized out. They are almost always optimized out on compilers that do link time optimization. And on compilers that do not, if they have knowledge of the function body (ie not just a prototype) it will be optimized out. Just look up inline optimization. However, you …
You can use the Outline view: Right-click on the method in the Outline view, and use “Open Call Hierarchy”. An other way to do it is to right-click on the annotation (@Setter for instance), and use “Open Call Hierarchy” on it, but it may not work with some annotations (like @Data).