In Python2, __repr__ (and __str__) must return a string object, not a unicode object. In Python3, the situation is reversed, __repr__ and __str__ must return unicode objects, not byte (née string) objects: class Foo(object): def __repr__(self): return u’\N{WHITE SMILING FACE}’ class Bar(object): def __repr__(self): return u’\N{WHITE SMILING FACE}’.encode(‘utf8’) repr(Bar()) # ☺ repr(Foo()) # UnicodeEncodeError: ‘ascii’ …
In order to format something in a string, a string representation of that something must first be created. “convert the value” is basically talking about how the string representation is to be constructed. In python, there are two fairly natural choices to get a string representation of something … str and repr. str is generally …
Background: In Python, there are two builtin functions for turning an object into a string: str vs. repr. str is supposed to be a friendly, human readable string. repr is supposed to include detailed information about an object’s contents (sometimes, they’ll return the same thing, such as for integers). By convention, if there’s a Python …
What you are seeing is the representation of my_string created by its __repr__() method. If you print it, you can see that you’ve actually got single backslashes, just as you intended: >>> print(my_string) why\does\it\happen? The string below has three characters in it, not four: >>> ‘a\\b’ ‘a\\b’ >>> len(‘a\\b’) 3 You can get the standard …
>>> x = ‘foo’ >>> x ‘foo’ So the name x is attached to ‘foo’ string. When you call for example repr(x) the interpreter puts ‘foo’ instead of x and then calls repr(‘foo’). >>> repr(x) “‘foo'” >>> x.__repr__() “‘foo'” repr actually calls a magic method __repr__ of x, which gives the string containing the representation …
The Python manual has this to say about id(): Return the “identity” of an object. This is an integer (or long integer) which is guaranteed to be unique and constant for this object during its lifetime. Two objects with non-overlapping lifetimes may have the same id() value. (Implementation note: this is the address of the …
Alex summarized well but, surprisingly, was too succinct. First, let me reiterate the main points in Alex’s post: The default implementation is useless (it’s hard to think of one which wouldn’t be, but yeah) __repr__ goal is to be unambiguous __str__ goal is to be readable Container’s __str__ uses contained objects’ __repr__ Default implementation is …