How to escape double quotes in as a parameter to an NUnit TestCase?
The correct way to escape double-quotes in VB is by doubling the double-quotes: <TestCase(“FirstNode”, “<node id=””FirstNode””>”)>
The correct way to escape double-quotes in VB is by doubling the double-quotes: <TestCase(“FirstNode”, “<node id=””FirstNode””>”)>
Use @BeforeEach instead of @Before and @AfterEach instead of @After.
ExpectedException would have been the correct method for NUnit 2.X, but it was removed from NUnit 3. There’s a various snippets of discussion in the NUnit Google Group and the equivalent Dev group – but it looks like the decision was made that it’s generally a better design pattern to test expected outcomes, and exceptions … Read more
Not sure if I had the same problem as you but I am using gradle and for some reason the tests just wouldn’t run anymore, with the same error as you had. I tried cleaning and rebuilding but to no avail. After hours of frustration and trying to find an answer I came across the … Read more
As some comments have echoed, structuring your tests in this manner is probably a design flaw in the tests themselves and you should consider restructuring them. However, if you want to do this and rely on the fact that the test runner you are using executes them in an alphabetical (seemingly) order then I suggest … Read more
There is one option to use TestCaseSource attribute. Here I provide a non-assert test with two cases just to see how it works: [TestFixture] public class TestClass { private static readonly object[] _sourceLists = { new object[] {new List<int> {1}}, //case 1 new object[] {new List<int> {1, 2}} //case 2 }; [TestCaseSource(“_sourceLists”)] public void Test(List<int> … Read more
I didn’t quite understand what do you plan to do — the rule of thumb is “not to be smart with tests” – just have them there, plain written. But to achieve what you want, if you inherit from unittest.TestCase, whenever you call unittest.main() your “abstract” class will be executed – I think this is … Read more
NUnit test methods actually can be generic as long as the generic type arguments can be inferred from parameters: [TestCase(42)] [TestCase(“string”)] [TestCase(double.Epsilon)] public void GenericTest<T>(T instance) { Console.WriteLine(instance); } If the generic arguments cannot be inferred, the test runner will not have a clue how to resolve type arguments: [TestCase(42)] [TestCase(“string”)] [TestCase(double.Epsilon)] public void GenericTest<T>(object … Read more
You should annontate your class with @RunWith(Enclosed.class), and like others said, declare the inner classes as static: @RunWith(Enclosed.class) public class DogTests { public static class BarkTests { @Test public void quietBark_IsAtLeastAudible() { } @Test public void loudBark_ScaresAveragePerson() { } } public static class EatTests { @Test public void normalFood_IsEaten() { } @Test public void badFood_ThrowsFit() … Read more
You must specify it like so: nosetests <file>:<Test_Case>.<test_method>, or nosetests test_web.py:TestWeb.test_checkout See the docs